Sunday, March 15, 2009

Anti Outsourcing : Pharma First Victim

With Barack Obama taking over as the President of the United States, outsourcing of activities from the US to the Indian market might get adversely affected, hitting the pharmaceutical sector the most, a top industry official said.

"President Obama has a conservative stance on outsourcing of services since he wants to create jobs and protect existing ones (in the US). As the Indian pharma industry is sustaining mainly on outsourcing, especially from the US, the future does not appear very smooth," pharma major Promed Group's President Deepak Bahri told PTI.

The Promed group manufactures and delivers branded as well as generic pharmaceutical formulations to Russia, CIS, south-east Asian countries, the UK and EU.

There will be increased competition in the US generics market since the US Food and Drug Administration-approved plants will enable many players to enter into the US market, earlier ruled exclusively by a few big companies, Bahri said.

"Companies that are cost-effective and good in supplies will survive," Bahri said.

With the global economy in a recession, it would make business sense for Indian pharma companies to address the CIS markets.

"CIS nations are taking aggressive steps to address their healthcare sector. Therefore, Indian pharma companies should be ready to grab the opportunities available in these markets," he said.

Though the healthcare system in the CIS countries are in a process of reformation, there are several challenges for the drug manufacturers.

"The shift towards the generic market has opened the gates for a variety of international companies and the market has become fiercely competitive," Bahri added.

Pharma companies have experienced a dip in profit margins on account of the global slowdown, Bahri said, attributing it to competition from China and appreciation of the Rupee against the US dollar.

Indian companies, however, have proved their manufacturing and research and development capabilities and the CIS nations can benefit enormously by establishing tie-ups with Indian pharma companies, he said.

"Today, the markets have evolved with time. In countries like Russia, consumers are ready to pay a higher cost for quality and there are international competitiors who are fighting for a share of these growing markets," he said.

The global meltdown could negatively impact Indian pharma exports but "good relationships with the target audience help to sustain longer in the markets," Bahri said.

Marketing of pharma products calls for a strong field-force network complimented with a robust supply-chain. A growing product portfolio is the key to beat competition and this will ensure a constant flow of income into the business," the Promed chief said.

The Promed Group is an emerging Indian pharmaceutical entity offering pharmaceutical products to global markets and has clocked a growth rate of 119 per cent for the period April-December 2008 as compared to the year-ago, Bahri said.

In the last five years, the company has recorded a Compound Annual Growth Rate of 34.49 per cent, an absolute growth of 340.80 per cent and an average yearly growth of 68.01 per cent.

The group clocked a turnover of Rs 100 crore (Rs 1 billion) in FY 08.

FICCI worried: Outsourcing Blues

ASSOCHAM president Sajjan Jindal has expressed serious concern over the Obama administration decision to deny tax benefits to US companies that outsource their jobs, adding that it will prevent free flow of goods and services under WTO regime.

In a statement, Jindal said that the beneficiary of outsourcing jobs has not only been the receiving country but more so the country which has outsource their jobs in the past and the trend will remain so even in future. Estimates reveal that a US$ job outsourced fetched the outsource country more than 10 times of economic benefits and therefore discourage outsourcing by denying tax benefits can prove disastrous, Jindal added.

The entire world is reeling under pressures of global meltdown and assuming that protective measures like denial of tax benefits will work towards benefis of domestic economy will prove be a serious mistake. It will also go against the spirit of competition and free market economies in which trans-national trade barriers are fastly fading away and the color of the capital is becoming colorless.

Jindal has called for its immediate renew for final withdrawal as the rest of economies will get inspired with this decision to provide unnecessary safeguards for their corporates.

Earlier: Tax breaks for outsourcing

Tax breaks for outsourcing

John Kerry has been claiming that loopholes in the tax code encourage companies to send jobs off shore. .

Here's the loophole:

...the ability to defer and often never pay taxes on foreign-earned profits. The result: foreign profits of U.S. companies end up taxed at a lower rate than their U.S. income, creating an incentive to invest overseas in factories. The jobs are where the factories are.

And here's how it works

The tax code is written in a way that allows companies not to pay the full 35% U.S. corporate tax rate on foreign income when that money remains invested overseas.

Backing up a step, here's how it works before the loophole: A company earns $100 million abroad in Lowtaxistan where the corporate tax rate is 20%. The foreign subsidiary pays that money to the U.S. parent. The parent then pays $35 million to the U.S. government and takes a credit for the 20% (or
$20 million) payment to the Lowtaxistan government. So the net to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service is $15 million.

But here's how it works with the loophole: The U.S. subsidiary simply keeps the money offshore and certifies to its accountants that the money is invested overseas. It never remits the money to the parent and so never pays the $15 million extra to Uncle Sam.

The buzzword for people in the know in big corporations is "unrepatriated earnings" i.e. money you make off shore that doesn't come home to the US. Apparently, its getting to be more and more prevelent.

These are called "unrepatriated earnings" and they are increasingly commonplace. ...

What we know is that the amount of unrepatriated foreign earnings is growing substantially. The non-partisan Congressional Research Service in a report last year said it had increased to $639 billion in 2002 from $403 billion in 1999....

If you look into the issue on companies balance sheets

What you'll find is something like this from Pfizer.

"As of December 31, 2003, we have not made a U.S. tax provision on approximately $38 billion of unremitted earnings of our international subsidiaries. These earnings are expected, for the most part, to be reinvested overseas. It is not practical to compute the estimated deferred tax
liability on these earnings."

Pfizer says it added 15,000 U.S. workers through its recent purchase of Pharmacia. Still, only 37% of its work force is in the U.S.

Note that the $38 billion total of unremitted earnings is cumulative over the years. In 2002, Pfizer had $29 billion, so the increase was $9 billion in the past year, helping the company substantially shave its tax bill.

According to the article, this is how the tax code has been set up since the early 1900s, when the ability to move capital and goods so freely was never considered.

And, being the Journal, they, of course, are not advocating fixing the problem by closing this loophole. Nope, they claim that we need to allow our firms this tax break so they can stay competitive with lower taxed nations. Lest our firms simply move off shore. This argument seems falacious to me. There are lots of reasons that companies decide to stay in the US. Better workers, tradidition, infrastructure, rule of law, you name it, we've got it.


India Inc Worried: Obama Anti Outsourcing

After a decade of outsourcing transform India into much of the world's back office, Indians are worried that President Obama's new Administration—and the slowdown in the global economy—will cast a shadow over one of the fastest-growing sectors of their economy. Obama's $787 billion stimulus plan will make it increasingly difficult for U.S. companies receiving bailout money to hire foreigners on H1B Visas. The budget the President recently presented may also make it harder for U.S. companies that send jobs overseas to receive tax benefits.

In India, where the $63 billion IT sector makes up almost 7% of the national GDP, the moves are worrying government officials. Acting Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee groused about it over the weekend in an interview with CNN-IBN, a content partnership with Time Warner's ( owned by India's TV18. "We will have to address this issue," said Mukherjee, whose ministry has spent the last five months trying to restart India's slowing economy with tax cuts and spending plans. "We are opposing protectionism, not only here but at every forum."

WHAT'S NEXT?

Even more vexing for India's outsourcing industry is the lack of clarity about what might be coming next from the U.S. During a Feb. 24 speech to Congress, Obama said the Administration will eliminate "incentives for companies that ship jobs overseas," but the White House has not provided additional details. A line item in Obama's budget titled "Implement international enforcement, reform deferral, and other tax reform policies" is the only hint tax experts in the U.S. and in India have had about the policy. The estimates for tax revenues generated by that budget change start at $15 billion in 2009 and go up to $25 billion in 2012. Those inexact estimates, says Rosanne Altshuler, co-director of the Tax Policy Center (a joint venture of two Washington think tanks, the Urban Institute and the Brookings Institution), is an indication that the changes in tax policy have not yet been worked out, and likely will not become public until April.

Indians with a stake in the outsourcing industry are now waiting and watching. "Of course we are concerned," says Mohandas Pai, a board member and director of human resources at Infosys (, India's second-largest IT company by revenues. "But nobody knows what the devil is being referred to [in the Obama statement]."

At a time when nearly 5 million Americans have applied for unemployment benefits and another 1.7 million are working part-time jobs because they can't find full-time work, immigration and outsourcing have become key political issues in the U.S. As he did during his campaign, Obama has made clear during the first weeks of his Presidency that he intends to pursue policy changes to discourage outsourcing and the use of U.S. work visas—especially H-1B visas—that could cost American jobs. At no time has he made the exact policies clear, says Altshuler. Even within the government, the changes remain a mystery. Edward Kleinbard, the chief of staff for Congress' Joint Committee on Taxation, was forced to offer up a guess about the cryptic item in the budget during a meeting with a group of international lawyers last week. "Deferral will certainly be at play," he said, according to a report in Tax Notes, a publication of the Tax Policy Center. He was referring to how corporations are able to defer paying tax on income earned overseas until they bring that money back to the U.S.

That may not do enough to discourage outsourcing, says Andrew Kokes, vice-president for marketing at a Nashville-based outsourcing firm with 4,000 employees in India. Even if the U.S. proposes a punitive tax on companies doing work offshore or offers a tax break for those that do not, the changes wouldn't be large enough to offset the 20% to 30% benefit companies get in lower labor costs when they do certain work offshore, he says. "A tax break can't compete with that kind of arbitrage," says Kokes.

A WORLDWIDE TREND

The U.S. is not alone in this increasing aversion to foreign labor and to outsourcing. As the pain of the global economic crisis intensifies, countries all around the world are adopting policies that make it tougher for foreigners to get jobs. In the Gulf countries, where several million Indians are employed in jobs ranging from construction to banking, governments have cut down on work visas and sent unemployed Indians home by the planeload. A Dubai-based official with an airline (who asked not to be named) says construction companies chartered more than 30 flights in January alone to fly workers back to India. In Malaysia, 43 Indian workers who have overstayed their visas expect to be deported this week, as thousands more leave voluntarily. On Mar. 2, the British government started an inquiry into whether immigrant workers should be restricted to sectors of the economy that have documented worker shortages.

In India, these decisions have raised hackles. India's IT sector is seen as a source of national pride—an area where Indians see themselves as competing successfully on the global scene. Moreover, the millions of Indians living overseas send back more than $30 billion a year in remittances, making up 3% of the country's GDP, according to estimates by the International Labor Organization. Political groups, parlaying for support in upcoming elections, have grasped the issue, threatening boycotts and asking the Indian government to intervene behalf of its expatriates. "We feel that in the current economic environment it is imperative for global corporations to collaborate on technology and innovation," says Suresh Senapaty, the chief financial officer of Wipro , one of India's largest IT services companies. "Policies of protectionism will only hinder the revival of the world economy."

While the change in rules for H-1B hires may be popular in the U.S., it could have a long-term impact that policymakers are not foreseeing, according to a report on March 2nd researchers at Duke and Harvard universities. Disheartened by the change in visa rules, nearly 100,000 foreign workers could leave the U.S. and return to their home countries, researchers concluded. The two-year study asked those who had returned why they left the U.S., and found that increased opportunities in India and China made it easier for these highly trained workers to leave jobs in Silicon Valley and start businesses back in their home countries. "Short term, this will have no impact on the U.S., but long term this could spell disaster," says Vivek Wadhwa, the lead researcher on the study and a research associate at Harvard's law school. "When we start recovering, then the people we need are going to be in India and China."

Since 1990, the H-1B program has allowed foreigners holding at least a bachelor's degree to work for six-year spells at U.S. companies and to have a chance to apply for a green card. Companies such as Microsoft and Google have hired thousands of foreign workers on H-1B visas. It is unclear how many of them applied for—or received—green cards, but the green card backlog in the U.S. in 2006, the last year for which data are available, was more than 1 million.

At the same time, Labor Dept. and U.S. immigration statistics indicate that just a little more than half of the allotted H-1B visas went to the high-tech sector; others included workers in fields as diverse as academia, medicine, and the nonprofit world. Several studies have shown that while there is documented fraud in the H-1B visa system and that H-1B workers often depress the local wages for similar U.S. workers, these highly trained immigrants do fuel a disproportionate portion of U.S. innovation. Wadhwa points out that nearly half of Silicon Valley startups—including Google—were started by immigrants, and nearly a quarter of U.S. global patent applications are from foreigners. "Without doubt, these H-1B workers are adding to the innovation pool in the U.S.," says Wadhwa.



After Outsourcing: Obama After Nurses

Washington US President Barack Obama on Friday opposed the idea of inviting overseas nurses, including from India, to fill up the huge shortfall the United States is facing right now.

America like most of the Western countries is faced with acute shortage of nurses and in recent years it has allowed medical personnel from India, China and Philippines to immigrate to work in hospitals.

"The notion that we would have to import nurses makes absolutely no sense," Obama told a gathering of health experts and lawmakers at a White House meeting on health care reforms.

Instead, Obama argued that the best possible approach to meet this shortfall is to train people inside the country.

"For people who get fired up about the immigration debate and yet don't notice that we could be training nurses right here in the United States," he said responding to an observation made by Congresswoman Lois Capps from California.

"We have a huge shortage of nurses today. Estimates are that the US will be lacking over 500,000 nurses in the next seven years," said Democratic lawmaker Capps.

Last week, a legislation was introduced in the US Congress to create a special category of nursing visas, which would facilitate much faster and easier brining of trained nurses from Asian countries like India.

Called the "Nursing Relief Act of 2009" the legislation proposes to make provisions for the new category of visas for registered nurses with an annual limit of 50,000.

The legislation notes that there are more vacant nursing positions in the US than there are qualified registered nurses and nursing school candidates to fill those positions. And according to the Department of Labour, the current national nursing shortage exceeds 126,000.

Obama said there are a lot of people in the US who would love to be in the nursing profession, and yet the government is not able to providing them the resources to get them trained.

"That's something that we've got to fix. That should be a no-brainer. That should be a bipartisan no-brainer, to make sure that we've got the best possible nursing staffs in the country," Obama said amidst applause.

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Infosys: Dismisses Reports of Massive Layoffs!!

Bangalore: IT major Infosys dismissed reports that export-driven IT companies will resort to large scale layoff, following reports of slowdown of the US economy. Run-up to Budget 2008-09

Talking to reporters, on the sidelines of global launch of 'Finacle 10', a new version of core banking software here, Infosys Board Member and Human Resource Head, T.V. Mohandas Pai, said all companies undertake appraisals of its employees twice every year and identify the people who do not perform up to the expectations.

He said if the underperformers do not improve even after extra training then there will be a 'separation' or 'parting of ways'.

"This is no way a layoff. I think the media has created the reports that slowing down of the US economy has caused this and people have become more sensitive to it," he said.

Pai said the industry will hire 4.3 lakh people this fiscal and by this fiscal-end the IT industry will have two million people on its rolls.

He said the number of underperformers, being relieved, was 'very very small'.

Wipro TCS Hiring Plan

We have cut down on at least 20% of the total recruitment,” said a senior HR official of TCS in Gujarat. “Our focus has largely been to hire more experienced candidates than go in for fresh recruits”, the official added.

Similarly, international IT firm, Keane is not just going slow on recruitments, but have also adopted a ‘just-in-time-approach’ on hiring. “Since the last three years, we used to hire 30-40 % more people than the previous year. But this year we are sticking to almost the same number of people we recruited last year”, said Keane India senior VP S G Raja Sekharan.

“Since January we have already made job offers to 3,000 students, which is in the range of what we had did last year. We do not want to make job offers and scale back (if market conditions deteriorate),” he said.

“The confidence level in the markets is low compared to the levels that existed three years back. It is very difficult to forecast where the markets are headed in the recent future,” Mr Sekharan said.

IT-giant Wipro has introduced stringent ‘quality measures’ into their hiring pattern. “We have made our process even more stringent and brought in measures to ensure quality of hire. Innovative measures have been introduced including setting up a Talent Quality Group within Talent Acquisition”, said Wipro Talent Acquisition VP Pradeep Bahirwani.

In order to hire quality manpower, Wiro has also started campus hiring in US and UK. “We have pioneered programmes like Wipro Academy of Software Excellence (WASE) which helps graduates learn while they work on projects with us. We have an active campus program in India and have also started campus hiring in US and UK,” he said.